eiffelroom - Agents: are you still using or do you still have some code using the old syntax for agent? That is to say using the ~ operator. - Comments http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/agents_are_you_still_using_or_do_you_still_have_some_code_using_the_old_syntax_for_agent_that_i Comments for "Agents: are you still using or do you still have some code using the old syntax for agent? That is to say using the ~ operator." en Thank you http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/agents_are_you_still_using_or_do_you_still_have_some_code_using_the_old_syntax_for_agent_that_i#comment-368 <p>Thank you very much. That tool works very well. Fast and accurate.</p> Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:56:00 -0700 zsimic comment 368 at http://www.eiffelroom.org Tool to convert http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/agents_are_you_still_using_or_do_you_still_have_some_code_using_the_old_syntax_for_agent_that_i#comment-365 <p>I've put a tool at <a href="http://eiffelstudio.origo.ethz.ch/download">http://eiffelstudio.origo.ethz.ch/download</a> to update your classes to the new syntax.</p> Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:12:06 -0700 manus_eiffel comment 365 at http://www.eiffelroom.org Yes http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/agents_are_you_still_using_or_do_you_still_have_some_code_using_the_old_syntax_for_agent_that_i#comment-360 <p>Voted 'yes' because I do have lots of code using ~, but I think it would be very easy to get rid of all those ~ notations quickly and painlessly.</p> Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:26:02 -0700 zsimic comment 360 at http://www.eiffelroom.org Agents: are you still using or do you still have some code using the old syntax for agent? That is to say using the ~ operator. http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/agents_are_you_still_using_or_do_you_still_have_some_code_using_the_old_syntax_for_agent_that_i http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/agents_are_you_still_using_or_do_you_still_have_some_code_using_the_old_syntax_for_agent_that_i#comments Agents Eiffel language Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:59:21 -0700 manus_eiffel 231 at http://www.eiffelroom.org