<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.eiffelroom.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>eiffelroom - Which C compiler do you use on Windows to compile EiffelStudio C generated code? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Which C compiler do you use on Windows to compile EiffelStudio C generated code?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>At the moment Windows SDK is</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-102</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At the moment Windows SDK is a better choice because it is exactly the same C compiler than the one included in VS 2005 and it is completely free.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:46:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>manus_eiffel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 102 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is a limitation of the</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-101</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a limitation of the poll engine we are using. You should select the one you are really using. If you are still using VC++ 6.0 for compatibility with newer compiler from Microsoft, you should not check it. The goal of this poll is to see who is really using VC++ 6.0 for himself, not for others.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>manus_eiffel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 101 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Multiple Choice</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-3</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have Visual Studio 2003, 2005 and the Vista SDK installed.  The newest version of 6.0 appears to be using cl from the SDK.  I don&#039;t know, but wonder if the compiler from 2005 would be a better choice.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:38:25 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>saunders</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think the poll should have</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think the poll should have been a checkbox. I&#039;m still using VC++ 6.0 as well for example.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:59:22 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>berend</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The only 64-bit compiler</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-1</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The only 64-bit compiler available for free is the Microsoft one, unfortunately we cannot redistribute it.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:19:04 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>manus_eiffel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>True, that is indeed a</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-7</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;True, that is indeed a problem that I had not noticed. Is there a 64 bit variant of the borland compiler? MinGW might still be a replacement for Borland on the 32-bit platform (which will not go away too soon).&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:41:57 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>schoelle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MingW</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-5</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I guess we should give it a try, but we are looking at 64-bit C compiler and on Windows GCC is only 32-bit, at least last time I checked.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:44:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>manus_eiffel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MinGW</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comment-4</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mingw.org/&quot;&gt;http://www.mingw.org/&lt;/a&gt; - we are already using GCC on any other platform than Windows, why not on Windows directly?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:41:27 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>schoelle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Which C compiler do you use on Windows to compile EiffelStudio C generated code?</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.eiffelroom.org/poll/which_c_compiler_do_you_use_on_windows_to_compile_eiffelstudio_c_generated_code#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.eiffelroom.org/tag/c_compiler">C compiler</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:33:23 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>manus_eiffel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
