<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.eiffelroom.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>eiffelroom - UNIX - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/tag/unix</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;UNIX&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Ok.  I would have thought</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/article/daemon_howto#comment-199</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ok.  I would have thought that when detach returned, after the call to fork, that execution would have continued within the if-then, and then fallen through bypassing the call to execute.  I was confused, I guess, so I&#039;ll have to study it some more.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:28:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neitsdelf</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 199 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No. Detach, forks and then</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/article/daemon_howto#comment-196</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No. Detach, forks and then calls execute in the new process.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:46:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>patrickr</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 196 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Correction?</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.org/article/daemon_howto#comment-192</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn&#039;t the call to &amp;quot;execute&amp;quot; be outside of the if-then conditional?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:13:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Neitsdelf</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 192 at http://www.eiffelroom.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
